Since the last one is closed due to epic server misshap and major double postings, although, it did end nicely.

Congrats on filling your thread guys.

~your friend from the bondage faction

>>4
Where are the diapers here? All I see is lolicon.

Legendary Thread was Legendary

>>5
Don't bother replying to it, it will get deleted soon enough. We need to save more posts for pics!

>>1
This was a great pic to start the new thread with. Well done Anonymous.

I'm not sure if this was posted in the last epic diaper thread.

>>12
source???

Did anyone have a source for 958 in the old thread?

>>12 I ask for a source for this as well.

>>15
Was wondering about that one as well. There have been only two pages posted from it and only in Japanese. Someone has got to know the source, or at least what's going on.

>>15
>>18
Source is "Sex by Ken", that is the only diaper scene in it (that page and this one). Mostly schoolgirl sex stuff. I don't read japanese, but that story is something like girls meet this creepy guy, he rips their clothes off has sex etc. Then diapers them for whatever reason, then vibes and more sex, then one of them beats the crap out of the creepy guy with a big stick the end.

(for reference 958 is here: http://fetish.iiichan.net/kareha.pl/1173127667/958 )

>>12
Okay,I found it on 4chan and at the moment the site's frozen up so I can't check whether the thread found a source or not.

if someone could find ths source of these two pics I would be very greatful

Okay I HAVE to know the name of those last two.

Have to. PWETTY do find a sauce.. <3

Will be grateful.

source of 21 or 22, or at least a title or artist?

Dang it mod! Delete 32-34 thank you!

lets try new diaper art

>>12 So, was a source for this ever found?

90% of these are just reposts from the original thread....this is sad, from the guy who created the original, this is depressing.

90% of these are just reposts from the original thread....this is sad, from the guy who created the original, this is depressing.

>>47
>>46

What did you say about reposts?
Cause I say Irony!

>>48

Oh yes, because the total disregard of checking the old thread for pictures is EXACTLY the same as accidentally posting twice due to a browser error, amirite?

>>49
The internet.
Serious Buissness.

quit yapping and post moar daipers

i agree with everyone cept the greedy/horny idoits,we need new stuff not the same crap

>>53
I think the last thread covered the vast majority of diaper pics so it's going to be a little difficult now to find something that isn't a repost.

Despite the terrible revelation of post 433 of the previous Diapered Girls thread, I'm still interested in works by the person known as "9". Does anyone have any pictures not previously seen, or even more information about him?

>>57
I second the motion. An archive of all known pictures would also be appreciated.

>>59
holy shit...source?

>>60
I wish I knew. I'm sure it comes from one of the Meika Azumaya comics, but I'm not sure which one.

This one comes from Animated Komusume 8, by the circle Z-AGNAM — the same one that made the Azumaya series.

>>61
Why does it say mizuyoukan on the left?

>>59
I have volume 6, same girl (and diaper) but it doesn't have that scene.

I find the decapitated penis kind of creepy.

>>61
RS of this plox?

download source of >>61

Rapidsearch failed

21 and 22 come from Princess Poison Honey, I think. Though I cannot find it anywhere, even at Sanwa Publishing, who are the ones who made it, if my source is correct.
Pic not related

One question for this picture:
How did this happen?

>>72
I belive that picture is a Edit.

>>73
Are you sure?
Because the diaper doesn't look out of place.

>>72 oh yeah, that pic is original, no edits. ive seen that before.

>>72
That picture is from HAZIMARI NO SAYONARA[DOUJINSHI].

http://doujinshi.mugimugi.org/book/4212/HAZIMARI-NO-SAYONARA/%E3%81%AF%E3%81%98%E3%81%BE%E3%82%8A%E3%81%AE%E3%81%95%E3%82%88%E3%81%AA%E3%82%89

is there a download source? rapidsearch failed me miserably

>>78
hey! I've never seen that one before!
any more or sauce?

>>83 You can go to Danbooru (http://danbooru.donmai.us) and type 'adultbaby', 'diaper', 'pacifier', 'bib', 'binky' and related words. But most of the images you find there have already been posted in this thread and the previous one.

a panel from "Nannygoats Nursery" a storyline from "Madame Zelda's Zoo of Perversion"

http://madamezelda.smackjeeves.com

anyone know where this is from?

http://danbooru.donmai.us/post/show/40290/android-bib-blush-diaper-flush-maid-manga-monochro

>>85
Please stop posting that eye-bleedingly bad 'art' to every goddamn borderline related fetish board. No fetish is strong enough to stomach that crap.

>>85

It's from a manga called "Mika ni Harassment"
I've never found a translated version though

>>88

Wroooong.

http://madamezelda.smackjeeves.com/

There you are. In english and everything.

>>88
I don't see why people get so upset over Madame Zelda's, and frankly I don't care, because everytime someone complains about one of my posts; I get an extra 500-1000 hits in a night. So nuts to you "Anonymous >>88"
And incidently, you don't speak for all fetishists (especially me, who's fetish is strong enough to create it)
keep reading.

>>90
shut the fuck up you sick furfaggot, you and your horrible art ruined the thread. gg

Did anyone find the source for picture 466 from the old thread?

>>91 Actually, I tend to draw in more of a "funny animal" style, which is a popular comic genre of the 1950s & 60s (Albeit anthropomorphic in nature.) I don't particularly enjoy the majority of "furry" art on the web, with the exception of a few artists who are technically impressive in their renderings and those that work in a more American style.
Also I must disagree with you that my comics ruined the thread, seeing as I'm merely CONTRIBUTING to the collection of infantalist imagery that is compiled here and have obviously not prevented others from contributing to the board. However, I might posit that YOUR crude language has contributed NOTHING to the thread whatsoever. Regardless, just for you >>91 Anonymous with this post I'll include some of my non-anthro work which can be viewed on my DA account.
Have a nice day.

>>92

Uh-huh. People will freak out about Madame Zelda's being bad, but have no qualms about shit like this being posted? This art is so hideous it's actually a bonerkill.

>>96
Whoops. I thought since Mimi's art was posted in the last thread, it was okay. Total my bad.

>>95 You kinda sound like if you are actually scolting us because we don't like those drawings. Sorry to break this up to you but nobody really likes them; they are disturbing, like, those drawings kinda turn us off. Since nobody did, I will kindly tell you to stop posting it in this thread. there will be no "or else", it's just that we don't actually like it.

>However, I might posit that YOUR crude language has contributed NOTHING to the thread whatsoever.

>However, I might posit that YOUR crude language

>I might posit that YOUR

>might posit that

>posit

seriously?

>>95

I dig your stuff, really. I love the funny animal style, especially the Crumb/Wolvertonian style you emulate, which I'm a big fan of. But your attitude is pretty nose-in-the-air, "well I never!" I can only imagine you reaching for a lacy kerchief and the smelling salts to get your head together whilst searching for your lost monocle. Yeah, the comments are pretty worthless, but you're really not going to get anywhere with the responses. Post your stuff, roll your eyes at the shit comments, and keep on truckin'.

(I demand you draw some kind of "keep on truckin'" fetish art. As a completely random fucker who you have no reason to draw for.)

>>90
Sure you get extra hits if you spam your website, that's kind of the idea behind 'advertising', isn't it. You get your hits through your disregard of netetiquette, not because people (apparently consistently) complain about it, so no need to get smug about it.

If the artwork is of poor quality it's not contributing, you're actually diminishing the thread's quality. Even the likes of >>92 to >>94, while they should've never been posted here, at least aren't as boner-killing as the thumbnails to your pics.

You've been around long enough to know that furry artwork (which your 'funny animal' style is clearly a part of) isn't welcome on iichan, yet you disrespect that outright.

Fuck "netetiquette"...thats a fag's word and 94 kicks ass,if you never seen Trigun then thats why u don't like 94

FUCK YOU 101 I love MISTY

Wow, your all, ironically, acting like babies.

If someone posts art, no matter how bad, you should thank them. Why? Because I'm guessing that 9/10 of you can't even draw as half as good as any of the artists in this thread.

Wanna prove me wrong? Go for it. I'll thank you, no matter how shitty it is, because even a shitty effort is an effort. That doesn't mean I won't laugh at you privately, but I will make the effort to keep it off the board.

Oh, and as for Madame Zelda's stuff, if you don't like it, don't look at it. It's not as if just by posting in this thread you HAVE to look at it. If you glance at the thumbnail and it's not your thing, then keep on scrolling. It's not as if your being forced to spew your useless opinions to anyone who will listen.

It's better to be thought an asshole then to be proven one.

>>101

* This is the board that lets you create your own niche fetish thread. Every thread can have its own theme! Declare your theme in the title of your thread. Stick to the topic. Don't post unrelated images.
* Don't make dull/simple threads. Go for Creativity! 'Clothing' is not a niche!
* DON'T CREATE NEW THREADS IF THE TOPIC ALREADY EXISTS!
* Sorry, Beastiality/Loli violates my server agreement. Don't post it.
* Boob-specific board here.
* Pregnancy board here.
* Max image size is 10MB; Max thread count is 100; any thread with no activity in over a month will auto-close.
* I have made a number of changes to the board.

Where's it say Furry isin't welcome?

As I understand it, this isn't an art critique board, this is a wanking board. Look at the other threads on here, look at the other pictures in this very thread, and you'll see almost nothing but quality drawings, either drawn by professionals or those with talent close enough to it, and not for lack of amateuristic artwork on those subjects.

People pick the best representations of those fetishes and post them, thus creating the sort of quality that attracts new enthusiasts/posters. If we post crappy artwork here, either because we're desperate for new content or we act on a misguided sense of "trying is good enough" and set the bar for diaper art much lower than for the other fetishes, not only do we bring down the quality of the thread, we bring down the quality of the entire board with it, and undermine what little respect our niche fetish still holds.

You people sound like you're new to imgboards or something - this isn't deviantArt where everyone holds hands and cuddles no matter how retarded or crude the drawings are; art quality actually matters here: Iichan has always distinguished itself with quality of artwork over quantity. And >>106/>>107, don't you think there'd at least be several furry threads active on this board if the mods didn't delete them on sight?

Pic posted is blatant repost, yes. But it's a repost of beautiful art, serving as contrast to the crap above. More isn't better; show some class. At least everyone else on this board seems to be able to judge proper quality.

Does this meet the quality standard?

This one is from JUNGLE ONI Baby

Also, from JUNGLE ONI Baby

>>115
>>116
Sorry about the duplicates. the reply button is acting screwy.

>>118>>119 Subtile differences = must post?

>>112 source please

>>121
HASHIDAMAMORU, I think.

I have never had the desire to jerk off to shitty R.Crumb imitation fetish art and never will.

Thank you sir - you are a cancer.

yo more 116 style that looks alot like millie

>>108

So you'd just like to sit in an eternal loop, handing the same pics back and forth? I'd rather have some new content. But, it seems I'm a majority of one, so I'll just sit back down.

>>128 >>129 >>130
These images from a series of omorashi flash game/animations you can find on rapidsearch (query "drawcat"). Wetting, some diaper and a little scat (depending on choices - avoid the options with a big "O" character if scat isn't your thing).

(see http://fetish.iiichan.net/kareha.pl/1209166242/11 and http://fetish.iiichan.net/kareha.pl/1209166242/21 from the wetting thread)

I have no sauce...

The original had quite a lot of bloom, So i tinkered with the brightness.

BUMP

Bumping WITH ACTUAL CONTENT!!!

About the last image...

Artist : Errors
Source : http://danbooru.donmai.us/
Weight : 1.2 Mb

bump

does anyone know where this picture is from?

http://img413.imageshack.us/img413/9730/05nureosimezeme017502nvyk1.jpg

>>144

SMED and PUNISHMENT
ttp://smedandp.free100.tv/

But the site has since been deleted and the page just takes you to a generic porn trafficker. You can still find his works here on DLSite:
http://eng.dlsite.com/circle/profile/=/maker_id/RG01365.html

--Suichiro

>>144 >>145
Here's a rapidshare
http://rapidshare.com/files/47204272/SMED.rar

the rapidshare link doesnt work, could you please reupload?

file not found

>>147
Sorry, i just found the link in the last thread.

can anyone reupload SMED and PUNISHMENT plz...

(Sauce is RFSwitched)

>>157
>>158
>>159

loli

what the hell, loli's deleted while horrible shit like >>85 >>88 >>90 and >>95 stay?

because that HORRIBLE bullshit prolly doesnt violate the HORRIBLE hosting agreement

>>12 So, was a source for this ever found?

>>172 ok i know we ask this all the time but... SOURCE PLEASE!

Yeah please, when you post a new pic, give the sauce before someone ask. If you don't have any source, write ''no source''.

>>174 Okay then. No source for 172.

found on deviant art, origin is on the pic itself

i think the previous pic is a repost from the old thread, o well. here's another from the same person.